fbpx

TSE 2012-13 Bowl Picks – Summary

The 2012 college football regular season at The Saturday Edge ended on a successful note. We hit over 57% for the regular season. We had 10 winning weeks (out of 14 total) and at one point we had a six week winning streak. Definitely a good first year and I am quite convinced we can improve substantially on those numbers in year two.

But first things first. The 2012-13 college football bowl season is upon us and here is where you will find all The Saturday Edge cappers bowl picks summarized in one place. Please click on any cappers name for their 2012-13 bowl thread and more detailed information. Good luck to everyone and let’s have a great bowl season.

GoSooners

Toledo +10.5 – LOSER
Nevada +9 – WINNER
Bowling Green +7.5 – LOSER
BYU – SDSU U 48 – WINNER
Ball State +7.5 – LOSER
ECU +6.5 – LOSER
Duke +10 – LOSER
UCLA ML (-160) – LOSER
Minnesota +13 – WINNER
Navy +14 – LOSER
Syracuse +4 – WINNER
Texas +3.5 – WINNER
Michigan State +2 – WINNER
NC State – Vanderbilt U 52.5 – LOSER
Georgia Tech +8 – WINNER
Clemson – LSU U 59 – WINNER
Northwestern +1 – WINNER
Michigan +5 – PUSH
Wisconsin/Stanford Under 48 – WINNER
Florida State – NIU U 59 – WINNER
Louisville +14.5 – WINNER
Oregon – Kansas State U 75 – WINNER

Jimmyshivers

Utah St Aggies -10.5 – WINNER
Nevada Wolf Pack +9.5 – WINNER
BYU – SDSU U 48.5 – WINNER
Cincinnati Bearcats -7 – WINNER
UCF – 7 – WINNER
UL-Lafayette -6 – WINNER
Boise State -5 – LOSER
Fresno State -12 – LOSER
SMU TT 24.5 – LOSER
WKU -6 – LOSER
Bowling Green +7.5 – LOSER
UCLA -1 – LOSER
Syracuse +4 – WINNER
Minnesota – Texas Tech U 56 – LOSER
Michigan State +2.5 – WINNER
Michigan Wolverines +6 – WINNER
Vanderbilt Commodores -7 – WINNER
Tulsa – Iowa St Over 50.5 – LOSER
Tulsa Golden Hurricanes ML (+112) – WINNER
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets +7.5 – WINNER
Clemson Tigers +6 – WINNER
Northern Illinois Huskies +13.5 – LOSER
Wisconsin Badgers +6.5 – WINNER
Louisville +14.5 – WINNER
Oregon – Kansas State U 76 – WINNER
Oregon – Kansas State 1st H U 37.5 – WINNER
Texas A & M -3 – WINNER
Pitt – Ole Miss O 52 – WINNER
Arkansas State -3.5 – WINNER
Notre Dame +10 – LOSER

Maggiore

Michigan State +2 – WINNER
Purdue – OSU O 70 – WINNER
Northwestern PK – WINNER
South Carolina -4 – WINNER
Nebraska +8 – LOSER
Wisconsin +4 – LOSER
NIU +14 – LOSER

Pezgordo

Nevada +9.5 – WINNER
BYU – SDSU U 48.5 – WINNER
UCF – Ball State O 61.5 – LOSER
UCF TT O 34 – WINNER
ECU +6.5 – LOSER
ECU – ULL U 69 – LOSER
Fresno State -11.5 – LOSER
Bowling Green +7.5 – LOSER
Ohio – ULM O 59 – PUSH
Rutgers +3 – PUSH
Minnesota – Texas Tech U 57 – LOSER
Minnesota +13 – WINNER
Syracuse +4 – WINNER
Texas +3.5 – WINNER
Michigan State – WINNER
NC State – Vanderbilt U 52 – LOSER
Tulsa +1.5 – WINNER
Georgia Tech – USC U 63 – WINNER
Clemson – LSU U 59.5 – WINNER
Northwestern +2 – WINNER
Purdue +17 – LOSER
NIU – Florida State U 59 – WINNER
Oregon – Kansas State U 75.5 – WINNER

SabertStxVii

Nevada vs Arizona over 75.5 – WINNER
Utah St. – 10.5 – WINNER
BYU -3 (-115) – WINNER
UCF vs Ball State over 61.5 – LOSER
UCF -7 – WINNER
UCF TT over 34 – WINNER
UL-Lafayette -6.5 – WINNER
Boise State -5 – LOSER
Fresno State -11.5 – LOSER
WKU -6 – LOSER
Bowling Green +7.5 – LOSER
Baylor +3 – WINNER
Cincinnati -9 – WINNER
UL-Monroe -7 – LOSER
Vanderbilt -7 – WINNER
NC State – Vanderbilt U 52 – LOSER
Clemson +6.5 – WINNER
Georgia -8.5 – WINNER
Stanford -6 – PUSH
Oregon – Kansas State 1st H U 37,5 – WINNER
Oregon – Kansas State U 74 – WINNER
Texas A & M -3 – WINNER
Ole Miss -3 – WINNER
Alabama -9.5 vs ND – WINNER
ND +6 1st half – LOSER
Alabama/ND UNDER 41 – LOSER
First Score FG/Safety (+150) – LOSER

Trentmoney

All of Trent’s selections are exclusive to the newsletter. However, I will post his results here after each game.

Bowling Green +7.5 – LOSER
Rutgers +3 – PUSH
Syracuse +4 – WINNER
Michigan State – WINNER
Tulsa PK – WINNER
Northwestern – WINNER
Michigan +6 – WINNER
Wisconsin +6.5 – WINNER
Northern Illinois +13 – LOSER
Notre Dame +10 – LOSER

Tags

More Betting on College Football Articles

20 thoughts on “TSE 2012-13 Bowl Picks – Summary”

  1. DK says:

    57% is considered doing very well? That’s terrible, IMO.

    • Terry says:

      Dude, they hit over 57% on 400+ wagers. I would consider anything above 55% on that large of a sample size as very good. Anything between 56% and 58% should be considered excellent.

    • Tim H says:

      I have been following this site since week 4….excellent writers with great analysis. 57% IS excellent. DK, start your own site, fund it, and predict higher than 57%, then you can talk. Saturday Edge wouldn’t have as many followers as it does by putting out bad picks, bad information, and bad c/s. All of the guys here are stand-up gentlemen….IMO.

      Best of luck rest of the way in the bowl season guys.

      Tim

  2. Jerry says:

    Wow, if you don’t think that 57% is good then you are in for a rude awakening!

  3. gail says:

    No doubt! I can only hope for a 57%!

  4. Danny Fuhs says:

    I signed up for the newsletter but didnt receive the first slate of bowl games. Do i need to do something else?

    • Pezgordo Pezgordo says:

      Danny, I just sent you a copy of last week’s bowl newsletter. Did you receive the first of the 7 college football handicapping tips?

      If not check your inbox for the opt-in email to confirm your newsletter subscription.

  5. John Weaver says:

    Why does Sabert have Fresno St. as a 4 star pick on another site but not on this one? Thanks

  6. jimmyshivers jimmyshivers says:

    I’ve also played SMU TT Under 24.5 on the island tonight. BOL gentlemen, and merry Christmas!

  7. Seth says:

    Fresno State is the perfect example of why handicapping a bowl game can be so difficult.

  8. Ed says:

    No opinion on minnesota from maggiore ???

    • Pezgordo Pezgordo says:

      I heard from him last week and he said he would have his Big 10 and BCS Bowl game picks ready to go by this week. However, I have not heard from him since. I sent him an email earlier today. Hopefully we get his picks asap.

  9. tom says:

    i see more red losses then i usually am accostomed too
    but someone has to tell me this answer what made 2 of your people bet rutgers? did you know they have a grammer scholl qb when you made choice?
    that was maybe the worst acting as a qb that i have ever seen

    • Pezgordo Pezgordo says:

      Both those QBs were pathetic. I knew my Rutgers wager was in trouble when they kept entering Va Tech territory and coming away with nothing.

    • Trentmoney says:

      Rutgers was kicking a fg in the 4th qtr to go up by 13 while getting +2.5 against a team they had held to less than 100 yds offense to that point…kicker missed…he missed again in OT to tie
      It happens…
      No big deal

      But did we chase a bad number on the play? No
      Did we use poor money management? No
      To the contrary, we got the best possible number (+2.5) BEFORE everyone else thought RU plus the points were a good opportunity, as the scarlet knights moved all the way to -1 on game day
      We were ahead of the curve…
      and if the game continued to multiple OTs we could have covered while others on the same side would have lost ats

      That, Tom, is what you should be focused on…

      good luck

  10. Ed Rapach says:

    Thank you so much for your time and effort for a profitable bowl season TSE. Ready to follow next year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

MAXIMIZE YOUR EDGE

Categories

Archives

Follow Us



2023 CFB Premium Pick Results 

GOSOONERS         13-12 (52.00%)
PEZGORDO            38-28 (57.58%)

YTD RECORD       51-40 (56.04%)