Big Ten Football – What we learned week 1
Big Ten Football – What we learned week 1
One week is in the books for the 2013 Big Ten football season and we learned some things about a few of the teams in the league. The conference saw every team open this week and collectively put up a 10-2 record. Anyone can look at a scoreboard and see the conference record, but we want to look at these games and see what information we can gather from a handicapping perspective.
1. Purdue’s offense is terrible
The Boilermakers put up just 226 yards (under 4 yards per play) and fumbled 5 times (losing 2). It is not as though the defense was much better, but they spent a ton of time on the field and were put in bad spots the entire game. Purdue has a group of players that were recruited to run a more wide open offense, but now they are trying to play in a more run oriented attack. They look like they are trying to stick a square peg into a round hole. I don’t think the defense will be bad all season so I am going to start considering Purdue as an under team going forward. The offense will look better next week against Indiana State, a team that gave up 73 to Indiana on Thursday, but don’t be fooled. Hopefully, 50 points next week will get us a few extra points on the total in week 3 against Notre Dame.
2. Nebraska’s still can’t play defense
First things first…Wyoming has a pretty good offense. That said, the Huskers showed their youth and looked awful on defense. The Cowboys rolled up 602 yards including 219 rushing. Nebraska had plans to play a lot of different kids and I am not sure they figured anything out in this one. On the other hand, Taylor Martinez and company on offense rolled up 530 yards of their own. The Huskers look like an over team against anyone that can move the ball. It is not as though you can just blindly bet Nebraska overs, but the total is the first thing you should look at with the Huskers. The “Blackshirts” no longer reside in Lincoln.
3. The Jury is still out on….
Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana and Ohio State all had fairly easy times with inferior opposition. All four also rolled up a ton of yardage: 632 (Indiana) 460 (Ohio State) 598 (Wisconsin) 463 (Michigan). It is hard to say how consistent these teams are going to be going forward as we didn’t gather much from these blowouts, but it does show there are some coaches in the league that won’t hesitate to keep scoring.
Week 2: Games worth watching
Week 2 is not one to get real excited about in the Big Ten, but there will be value in some of the lines. There are a few real stinkers, but a couple of games will be worth your time. Cincinnati and Illinois should be decent as the Fighting Illini will be at home and will give a much better fight than Purdue did on Saturday. Notre Dame will visit the Big House Saturday night and we will learn a lot more about Michigan in that one.
I will be back on Tuesday with my first look at the 12 games on next week slate.
Definitely agree w/ Purdue being a potential under team. Offense should struggle all season and the defense is not too bad.
Illinois looked very much like last year’s team so I have zero ideas why they are only +8. I faded them hard last year and am researching this play because somethings not right.
Wes
Beckman is a poor coach. I knew when they hired him all Illinois was getting was a Zook retread. I’m also looking at this game. The only thing that concerns me is a first year (but experienced) coach taking his team on the road for the first time. I’m not sure Purdue was a good measuring stick for Cincy since they were a bad team that is pretty much in a rebuilding mode.
I think the line ought to be Cincinnati -14. Something is not right about the line. It’s causing big caution signs to go off in my head every time I consider playing it.
Lastly i just wanted to say, i heard the same talk all summer about NW@CAL. Most thought is should have been a DD spread also. it dropped from 8.5 to 5.5 then up to 6.
Phil Steele has Illinois as his “Underdog Play of the Week” this week.
I’m seeing Illinois +7.5 now …. and this game opened at 10? Who the hell is betting on the Illini? Their D really sucks. I see Cincinnati scoring 40+ here …. over 54 (key number 55) looks good too.
Yes please explain…is Vegas playing with my head? All the experts pegged iLLni at the bottom below perdue.
Just so were clear. No one has a prob with me taking CINCI -8.
A certain line-moving pick service bet on the Ilini at 10. I’m totally fine with this service doing what they do because it allows me to get MUCH better numbers on the other side sometimes.
I can’t believe your not excited about ND @ Mich…watch the over hit now…
This UC-Illinois game has my head spinning….When I made a guess at the lines, I was thinking 11.5-13. 7-8 just seems like a trap to me. I think that Illinois will find a way to put up some points, but how are they going to stop Cincy?
Michigan and ND should be a very good ball game! I think Michigan is better than a lot of people are giving them credit for.
I agree with you guys about this game. But just playing devil’s advocate here, Illinois QB Scheelhaase is healthier and supposedly improved. And Ferguson looks like a pretty salty receiver coming out of the backfield. If there is any way Illinois can possibly keep it close it would be because of these guys. But I still have my doubts. It will probably be another high scoring game.
Awesome! Its in fact amazing paragraph, I have got much clear idea regarding from this piece of https://casinossir.com